Performace Measurement Powerpoint

DO YOU KNOW WHY YOUR FRIENDS ARE POSTING BETTER GRADES THAN YOU? — THEY ARE PROBABLY USING OUR WRITING SERVICES. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 15% discount by using the coupon code WELCOME15.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Performance Measurement PowerPoint Slideshow Guidelines

Update 11/6/2017

Purpose

The purpose of this PowerPoint presentation is to locate and compare performance measurement data on common health conditions for the hospitals in your area. You will investigate the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services websites and locate the section called Hospital Compare. There you will find data for hospitals within a 50-mile radius of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences. You will prepare a PowerPoint presentation and share the results of your findings. Opportunities for improving performance measurement indicators will be shared.

Course Outcomes

Completion of this assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

CO1: Apply leadership concepts, skills, and decision making in the provision of high-quality nursing care, healthcare team management, and the oversight and accountability for care delivery in a variety of settings. (PO2)

CO2: Implement patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within the context of the interprofessional team through communication and relationship building. (PO3)

CO3: Participate in the development and implementation of imaginative and creative strategies to enable systems to change. (PO7)

CO7: Apply leadership concepts in the development and initiation of effective plans for the microsystems and system-wide practice improvements that will improve the quality of healthcare delivery. (POs 2 and 3)

CO8: Apply concepts of quality and safety using structure, process and outcome measures to identify clinical questions as the beginning process of changing current practice. (PO8)

Directions

  • Review information found on the following website related to hospital compare http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/HospitalQualityInits/HospitalCompare.html (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
  • Read the information carefully and then locate the following website. http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
  • Search for hospitals within a 50-mile radius of the community where you are working or had your prelicensure clinical experiences. Type in your zip code. Select your hospital and two others. Select hospitals/facilities and choose compare. If you live in a remote area and there are nohospitals listed within a 50-mile radius, select a zip code for a family member or a close friend who does not live near you. The idea is to review comparative data.
  • Click on the following topics to learn more.
    • Survey of patient’s experiences
    • Timely and effective care (focus your search on two of the conditions that apply to services provided at the hospitals)
    • Readmissions, complications, and deaths
  • Carefully read the information provided.
  • Develop a PowerPoint slideshow consisting of 8-10 slides. Include the following, keeping in mind what all this data means.
    • Title slide with information pertinent to the course.
    • List reasons to recommend the website Hospital Compare to consumers (patients).
    • List reasons to recommend the website Hospital Compare to staff who may seek employment.
  • For the slides below, clearly label the name of each hospital:
    • Summarize patient experiences data for each hospital.
    • Summarize timely and effective care data for two conditions.
    • Summarize data for readmissions and complications and deaths.
    • List recommendations for improving data for one selected facility.
    • Summarize what you learned from this experience.
      Criteria Ratings Pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle slide

      Slide contains pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member.

      10.0 pts

      Slide contains all pertinent information related to assignment, course, student, date, and faculty member

      9.0 pts

      Slide contains most information; however, one component is missing.

      8.0 pts

      Slide contains most information; however, two to three components are missing.

      4.0 pts

      Slide contains some information; and more than three components are missing or slide is missing.

      0.0 pts

      Title slide is missing.
      10.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons to recommend hospital compare to patients

      Format of reasons is logical, easy to read, and specific.

      20.0 pts

      At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the patient’s perspective.

      18.0 pts

      Three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the patient’s perspective.

      16.0 pts

      Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to patient’s perspective.

      8.0 pts

      One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the patient’s perspective.

      0.0 pts

      No reasons given are given to recommend hospital compare to patients.
      20.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReasons to recommend hospital compare to staff

      Format of reasons is logical, easy to read, and specific.

      30.0 pts

      At least four reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are directly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

      26.0 pts

      Three reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are mostly related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

      24.0 pts

      Two reasons are included and are logical and easy to read and are somewhat related to the potential staff member’s perspective.

      11.0 pts

      One reason is included but is not logical or easy to read and is not from the potential staff member’s perspective.

      0.0 pts

      No reasons are given to recommend hospital care to potential staff members.
      30.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to patient experiences

      Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C and data related to patient experiences is displayed.

      30.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed and data related to patient experiences are thoroughly displayed.

      26.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed data related to patient experiences are clearly displayed.

      24.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed and data related to patient experiences are briefly displayed.

      11.0 pts

      Three hospitals are included but data related to patient experiences are difficult to ascertain.

      0.0 pts

      Fewer than three hospitals are summarized and no data related to patient experiences are included.
      30.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to timely and effective care

      Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Two different conditions are named and applied to hospitals A, B, and C.

      30.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed. Two different conditions are named and concisely applied to the hospitals.

      26.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed. Two different conditions are named and somewhat applied to the hospitals.

      24.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed. One condition is named and somewhat applied to the hospitals.

      11.0 pts

      Only one or two hospitals are listed and labeled appropriately. Only one condition is named and applied

      0.0 pts

      No hospitals are listed or labeled, and no conditions are named or applied.
      30.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummarize data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths

      Three hospitals are labeled A, B, and C. Data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are appropriately displayed.

      30.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed and data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are thoroughly displayed.

      26.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed and data related to readmissions, complications and deaths is clearly displayed.

      24.0 pts

      Three hospitals are listed and data related to readmissions or complications or deaths (but not all three) is briefly displayed.

      11.0 pts

      Only one or two hospitals are selected but data related to readmissions, complications, and deaths are difficult to ascertain.

      0.0 pts

      No hospitals are summarized and no data are provided.
      30.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations for improving data for one facility

      Either hospital A, B, or C is specified, or recommendations for improving data are appropriately displayed.

      20.0 pts

      One of three hospitals is selected. Five or more recommendations for improving data are listed and thoroughly described.

      18.0 pts

      One of three hospitals is selected. Three to four recommendations for improving data are listed and clearly described.

      16.0 pts

      One of three hospitals is selected. Two recommendations for improving data are listed and briefly described.

      8.0 pts

      One of three hospitals is listed. One recommendation for improving data is listed.

      0.0 pts

      No hospitals are listed and no recommendations for improving data are listed.
      20.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of learning related to this assignment

      Learning about completing this assignment is stated. Summary of learning is displayed with lists, bulleted items, or other creative ways.

      20.0 pts

      Thoroughly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data.

      18.0 pts

      Generally summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data.

      16.0 pts

      Briefly summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment; including value of data.

      8.0 pts

      Minimally summarizes learning related to performance measurement assignment; does NOT include value of data.

      0.0 pts

      Summary of learning related to performance measurement assignment, including value of data, is missing or so brief that understanding of concepts is difficult to ascertain.
      20.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly writing and formatting

      Slides are provided and labeled appropriately. Punctuation and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check.

      10.0 pts

      All slides are provided and grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure are correct. There is evidence of spell and grammar check.

      9.0 pts

      Minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. Minimal indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

      8.0 pts

      Several errors in grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are several indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

      5.0 pts

      Numerous errors in punctuation, or sentence structure noted. There are many indicators of spelling or grammar errors.

      0.0 pts

      Many errors in writing to the extent that it is difficult to understand the meaning of the information presented on the slides.
      10.0 pts
      This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePower Point Use

      0.0 pts

      0 points deducted
      Power Point Used. 0 points deducted

      0.0 pts

      20 (10%) points lost
      Power Point not used as presentation template results in 20 (10%) points deducted from points possible. 20 points deducted
      0.0 pts
      Total Points: 200.0

Do you require writing assistance from our best tutors to complete this or any other assignment? Please go ahead and place your order with us and enjoy amazing discounts.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper