Quantitative Research Critique on Clinical Alarms In Intensive Care

DO YOU KNOW WHY YOUR FRIENDS ARE POSTING BETTER GRADES THAN YOU? — THEY ARE PROBABLY USING OUR WRITING SERVICES. Place your order and get a quality paper today. Take advantage of our current 15% discount by using the coupon code WELCOME15.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper

Please use the following guide below to answer all the critique questions. I chose the following research paper to do the critique on: http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.db16.linccweb.org/ehost…

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
CRITIQUE GUIDE

Use the following guide in
writing the critique:

1. Statement of the
Problem/Purpose

 Is the problem/purpose
clearly stated?

 Is it easy to identify and
locate?

 Is it significant to nursing?

2. Review of Literature

 Is it recent? Five years or
newer?

 Were primary sources of
authorities or experts used?

 Is it relevant to the stated
problem?

 Does it provide a solid basis
for the study?

3. Conceptual/Theoretical
Framework

 Is there a theoretical or
conceptual framework, rationale, and/or map, and (if so) is it appropriate? If
not, is the absence of one justified?

 Are key concepts adequately
defined conceptually?

4. Hypothesis(es) or research
question(s)

 Are research questions and/or
hypotheses explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified?

 Are they adequately stated
with clear specification of key variables and the study population?

 Are they placed in the
contexts of a theoretical or conceptual framework?

5. Research Method(s)

 Were appropriate procedures
used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study subject to
external review by an IRB/ethics review board?

 Was study designed to
minimize risk?

6. Research Design

 Does the approach fit the
purpose and hypothesis (es)?

 Was the most rigorous
possible design used, given the purpose of the research?

 Was the number of data
collection points appropriate?

 Did the design minimize
biases and threats to internal construct, and external validity of the study?

7. Population and Sample

 Was the population properly
identified and described? Was the sample described in sufficient detail?

 Was the best possible
sampling design used to enhance the sample’s representativeness? Were sample
biases minimized?

 Was the sample size adequate?
Was a power analysis used to estimate sample size needs?

8. Data
Collection and Measurement

 Are the
operational and conceptual definitions congruent?

 Were key
variables operationalized using the best possible method and with adequate
justification?

 Are
instruments objective? Reliable? Valid?

 Were data
collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff that collected data
appropriately trained?

9. Data
Analysis

 Were
appropriate statistical methods used, given the level of measurement of the
variables, number of groups being compared?

 Is a
thorough descriptive analysis given?

10.
Presentation of Findings/Implications

 Are all
hypotheses discussed with findings adequately summarized, with appropriate use
of tables and figures?

 Are findings
reported in a manner that facilitates a meta-analysis and with sufficient
information needed for evidence based practice?

 Were the
recommendations for clinical practice and further research reasonable and
complete?

 Are
limitations presented and adequate?

APA FORMAT

Do you require writing assistance from our best tutors to complete this or any other assignment? Please go ahead and place your order with us and enjoy amazing discounts.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper